|
September 17, 2008 10:25 AM
Posted By PCYC
|
|
A letter to the editor in this week's PIke County Courier urged the community not to support
lowering
the drinking age to 18, as was recently suggested by a growing group (120+) of college
presidents part of the Amethyst Initiative. They argue that
the current law increases problems associated with underage
drinking by forcing it underground into a dark and dangerous world.
I will withhold giving my two cents on the topic here save for some personal observations, but I think it is a good idea for young people, and the community, to engage in some dialogue on this topic. Not that Pike County can change the law, or that the PCYC will have much say in the matter, but I think one thing can be said for certain and reflected in our approach to this topic locally, alcohol consumption by young people becomes that much more perilous when we treat it as a sort of taboo topic. For instance: A friend of mine recalls when he went to college, his RA went so far as to provide the residents of the building with alcohol on weekends but ensured it was consumed in a relatively safe and responsible manner by the grown adults present (most of whom who were 18 years of age and could otherwise be dying for their country). Let's contrast that to where I went to school at American University, which had a "dry campus" where even 21 year-olds could not consume. As a result, most students engaged in binge drinking and hard-alcohol consumption. That led to many more being hospitalized and injured. College presidents and many others, in my interpretation and reading, have looked at underage drinking, by 18-21 year olds in particular, as an inevitable circumstance that we need to deal with more pragmatically as a country. Of course others, have stood up to this idea saying that only more harm can come. What has been your experience or what are your thoughts? Post by Nick Troiano, Executive Director View the letter: http://www.strausnews.com/articles/2008/09/16/pike_county_courier/opinion/1.txt |